It’s disappointing the school district has refused to follow the policies in place to protect our children.”Īlpine School District spokesperson David Stephenson said in an email that the district is “unable to give a comment until some other issues are resolved.” The right to parent a child At the end of the day, we would like the school district to step up and comply with its legal obligations. “We have tried to seek relief without pursuing litigation, but the school district would not agree to reasonable terms outside of court. “Ultimately, it should not be this difficult to ensure that the school district complies with its own policies requiring attendance, the taking of roll, and the supervision of students,” the parents said. They were disappointed in the decision and are “considering other options for relief,” according to a statement released by their attorneys at Mitchell Barlow & Mansfield in Salt Lake City. The parents had hoped to block the district from relaxing attendance rules for the end of the school year, according to their lawsuit. The core argument of the complaint, she wrote, was that since the district gave students free time during the final week of school, it did not do enough “to aid their efforts as parents to prevent JD from having sex.”īut the parents, identified only as John and Jane Doe, “have not provided any authority supporting the proposition that the government has a constitutional duty to help them parent JD,” Parrish decided. District Judge Jill Parrish has now given those claims a failing grade, in a decision released earlier this month and first reported in the Axios Salt Lake City newsletter. So the Latter-day Saint couple, whose faith prohibits premarital sex, sued the district and some administrators, arguing that their constitutional rights to parent their child and freedom of religion had been violated.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |